<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for antipaucity</title>
	<link>http://antipaucity.com</link>
	<description>fighting the lack of good ideas</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on is google killing our brains? by antipaucity</title>
		<link>http://antipaucity.com/2008/11/19/is-google-killing-our-brains/#comment-16059</link>
		<author>antipaucity</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://antipaucity.com/2008/11/19/is-google-killing-our-brains/#comment-16059</guid>
		<description>certainly tools are a wonderful thing - take maps, for example: I prefer a good local map to a GPS any day of the week</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>certainly tools are a wonderful thing - take maps, for example: I prefer a good local map to a GPS any day of the week</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on is google killing our brains? by Simon</title>
		<link>http://antipaucity.com/2008/11/19/is-google-killing-our-brains/#comment-16058</link>
		<author>Simon</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://antipaucity.com/2008/11/19/is-google-killing-our-brains/#comment-16058</guid>
		<description>I've been wondering if GPS has been killing our sense of direction and large-scale spatial relations. (and no, I still haven't bought one)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been wondering if GPS has been killing our sense of direction and large-scale spatial relations. (and no, I still haven&#8217;t bought one)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on al qaeda greets obama victory with an insult by antipaucity</title>
		<link>http://antipaucity.com/2008/11/20/al-qaeda-greets-obama-victory-with-an-insult/#comment-16043</link>
		<author>antipaucity</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://antipaucity.com/2008/11/20/al-qaeda-greets-obama-victory-with-an-insult/#comment-16043</guid>
		<description>I'll agree that it's not a full dichotomy, certainly some countries just aren't interesting enough to hate or love (take any small country that pretty much keeps to itself and doesn't have crazies of any stripe running around whacking each other for political reasons - for example, Chile or Micronesia).

Personally, I think we are pretty respectful of most other countries - excluding, for good reason, the ones who already hate us because we're rich&#124;non-muslim&#124;not-them&#124;some-other-ideology-at-play. Before the rise of modern Islamic fundamentalism, there were certainly others at play on the world stage: religious, political, ethnic, and otherwise.

I think the only way to be not a 'useful' target to any organization (terror or governmental) is to be a small enough player that what you have nobody else cares about. For that to happen to the US, our economy would have to freed from such deep ties to others around the world, we'd need to have fewer natural resources, a smaller population, no reason for folks to want to immigrate here, and be otherwise worse-off than those places that currently hate us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll agree that it&#8217;s not a full dichotomy, certainly some countries just aren&#8217;t interesting enough to hate or love (take any small country that pretty much keeps to itself and doesn&#8217;t have crazies of any stripe running around whacking each other for political reasons - for example, Chile or Micronesia).</p>
<p>Personally, I think we are pretty respectful of most other countries - excluding, for good reason, the ones who already hate us because we&#8217;re rich|non-muslim|not-them|some-other-ideology-at-play. Before the rise of modern Islamic fundamentalism, there were certainly others at play on the world stage: religious, political, ethnic, and otherwise.</p>
<p>I think the only way to be not a &#8216;useful&#8217; target to any organization (terror or governmental) is to be a small enough player that what you have nobody else cares about. For that to happen to the US, our economy would have to freed from such deep ties to others around the world, we&#8217;d need to have fewer natural resources, a smaller population, no reason for folks to want to immigrate here, and be otherwise worse-off than those places that currently hate us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on al qaeda greets obama victory with an insult by Tanner Lovelace</title>
		<link>http://antipaucity.com/2008/11/20/al-qaeda-greets-obama-victory-with-an-insult/#comment-16041</link>
		<author>Tanner Lovelace</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://antipaucity.com/2008/11/20/al-qaeda-greets-obama-victory-with-an-insult/#comment-16041</guid>
		<description>Your dichotomy in the last paragraph is false.  There is a third option and that is that we could be respectful enough of other countries and people that we do not give them a reason to hate us.  That is not the same as being "wish-washy ***holes" (I'm guessing you don't have kids, since you don't seem to watch your language much).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your dichotomy in the last paragraph is false.  There is a third option and that is that we could be respectful enough of other countries and people that we do not give them a reason to hate us.  That is not the same as being &#8220;wish-washy ***holes&#8221; (I&#8217;m guessing you don&#8217;t have kids, since you don&#8217;t seem to watch your language much).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on the vagaries of memory by antipaucity &#187; is google killing our brains?</title>
		<link>http://antipaucity.com/2006/11/30/the-vagaries-of-memory/#comment-16012</link>
		<author>antipaucity &#187; is google killing our brains?</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://antipaucity.com/2006/11/30/the-vagaries-of-memory/#comment-16012</guid>
		<description>[...] seems to go along with something I wrote a couple years [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] seems to go along with something I wrote a couple years [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on disingenuity by antipaucity</title>
		<link>http://antipaucity.com/2008/11/17/disingenuity/#comment-15999</link>
		<author>antipaucity</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://antipaucity.com/2008/11/17/disingenuity/#comment-15999</guid>
		<description>Personally, I'd argue they've innovated - but only where they *had* to. They didn't *have* to in the US, so they did elsewhere.

But that being said, they still have dozens of proven, popular models they could very easily import.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I&#8217;d argue they&#8217;ve innovated - but only where they *had* to. They didn&#8217;t *have* to in the US, so they did elsewhere.</p>
<p>But that being said, they still have dozens of proven, popular models they could very easily import.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on disingenuity by Benjamin Reed</title>
		<link>http://antipaucity.com/2008/11/17/disingenuity/#comment-15971</link>
		<author>Benjamin Reed</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://antipaucity.com/2008/11/17/disingenuity/#comment-15971</guid>
		<description>I think the difference is, the Big Three have failed to innovate for 20 years, and should have fallen down long ago.  Propping them up does nothing to save their apparent inability to judge the market -- your case in point.

I think we should let them fail, and we probably should have let the banks fail too and deflate the horrible amounts of leverage this country thinks is normal.  All we're doing is putting off another inevitable boom/bust if we can't change our culture of thinking large amounts of leverage is OK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the difference is, the Big Three have failed to innovate for 20 years, and should have fallen down long ago.  Propping them up does nothing to save their apparent inability to judge the market &#8212; your case in point.</p>
<p>I think we should let them fail, and we probably should have let the banks fail too and deflate the horrible amounts of leverage this country thinks is normal.  All we&#8217;re doing is putting off another inevitable boom/bust if we can&#8217;t change our culture of thinking large amounts of leverage is OK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
