Just what is journalism going to look like in the future?
Eric brought up the idea of supporting “special” journalism through services like Patreon.
I think that’s a start … but still limits – as do paywalls, subscriptions, etc – informing the populace to those who care enough to pay intentionally and specifically for that publication / journalist / etc.
Maybe there needs to be a per-hour, per-article, per-something option â€“ a penny for an hour, for example (which, ftr, comes out to a monthly fee of about $7)- so that viewers can toss some scrilla towards the creators, but arenâ€™t permanently encumbered by subscriptions theyâ€™ll soon forget about
I’ll go out on a limb and predict “journalism”, as we have known it for hundreds of years, is going to completely disappear in the next 10 years. Now, that doesn’t mean it’s completely going away (though, with the general willful ignorance of people…maybe it will). It does mean, though, that it’s going to be radically different in form.
The overwhelming majority of publishers are not receiving anything from their writing – except personal satisfaction (that includes myself ..Â in 20+ years of having websites, blogs, etc, I’ve made about $35 online). And publishing for “free” (ie, self-funded) shouldÂ always be an option: as a content creator, it should always be up to you as to whether you wish to charge for what you’ve made.
But if you want the possibility of getting paid for your work, that should be an option, too: and while youÂ might be “worth” subscribing to, the odds areÂ very good you are not. And that leaves a quandary: how can you get paid for your work (if you want), without encumbering your audience into either leaving instantly, or succumbing to pressure to subscribe.
Which is why I think a bucket approach could work well – you’d know how much you had available in your balance, recharging would be simple (could even be automated – hit a threshold, recharge to some preset amount), and you’d know exactly who was getting your money, and, more importanly, forÂ what – it’s not some ambiguous “subscription” to a “site”, but paying for precisely the content you see (or want to see).
In many ways, it’s extending the Patreon idea, which is really just a modern reimagining of patronage, from mere individualÂ shows, sites, etc, down to a granularity of specific pages, articles, images, etc.
And let’s not evenÂ talk about the analytics that could be performed on payments and page views under such a model: identifying regions that are interested in certain content, audiences that like certain things, what are immediate turn-offs, etc. Incorporate some form of solid feedback/interaction mechanism, and you could possibly develop healthy gamification of your site: maybe even waiving monetary contribution if you hit certain levels of interaction on the site.
Active community building via people who actuallyÂ care (and that just happens to fund the service).
NowÂ that would be something.